1951 Standard pistol

Includes .22 Standard, Mark I, Mark II, Mark III and all Centerfire Semi-Auto Pistols.
User avatar
arcticruger
Posts: 396
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2021 5:30 pm
Location: AK

Re: 1951 Standard pistol

Post by arcticruger »

gunman42782 wrote: Sun Jan 23, 2022 12:15 pm Don't know why, but the pics don't show up for me.
The server I host my pics on may have been down for a moment. Hopefully they’ll show up for you now.
User avatar
arcticruger
Posts: 396
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2021 5:30 pm
Location: AK

Re: 1951 Standard pistol

Post by arcticruger »

chet15 wrote: Sun Jan 23, 2022 7:12 am Nice snag!!
Chet15
Thanks!

Btw, I noticed something interesting on it. The safety selector/lever doesn’t have the “S” or “F” stamped on it. The only other pistol I was able to confirm so far that doesn’t have S or F stamped on the safety was the factory chromed Standards. So along with the blued trigger, this one also probably has the safety from the chromed version.
rpm enterprises
Posts: 90
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2021 8:38 am

Re: 1951 Standard pistol

Post by rpm enterprises »

Here is a consecutive pair. One has the chrome trigger and the other has a blued trigger.
Attachments
20211220_171917.jpg
User avatar
T.A. Workman
Posts: 610
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 6:02 am
Location: Ohio

Re: 1951 Standard pistol

Post by T.A. Workman »

Rick,
You never fail to amaze me, what a pair!
Thanks for sharing.

Terry
NRA Benefactor
Life Mem MOPH
Life Mem USMC
Clyde "Jug" Johnson - Six-Gun Man
rugerguy
Posts: 194
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2014 1:57 pm
Location: NE OHio

Re: 1951 Standard pistol

Post by rugerguy »

yes ,very nice indeed, is that the "cutoff" number from the variation #8 to #9 or are they interspersed, overlapped ( parts bin theory)..... ;)
User avatar
arcticruger
Posts: 396
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2021 5:30 pm
Location: AK

Re: 1951 Standard pistol

Post by arcticruger »

Wow, pretty cool pair right there! Nice display too.
User avatar
Rugerologist
Posts: 1016
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 6:31 pm
Location: Arkansas

Re: 1951 Standard pistol

Post by Rugerologist »

Consecutive standards are quite an accomplishment! Very nice display.
"I know of no more encouraging fact than the unquestionable ability of man to elevate his life by conscious endeavor." - Henry David Thoreau
Aquatic Biologist
NRA Life Member
R.O.C.S. Editor
R.C.A. Member #5050
R.E.N.E Subscriber
jowdurt
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2020 4:20 pm

Re: 1951 Standard pistol

Post by jowdurt »

rugerguy wrote: Sat Jan 29, 2022 4:07 pm yes ,very nice indeed, is that the "cutoff" number from the variation #8 to #9 or are they interspersed, overlapped ( parts bin theory)..... ;)
Looking at Chad's book, #8s were in three serial number blocks, 12,214-14,999, 17,000-24,999 and 30,001-35,029. #9s seem to be interspersed/overlapped with the second group from 17,273 to 21,808. I have seen people list their Standards as #9s based on the serial number but without a blue trigger. I tell them they have a #8.
User avatar
arcticruger
Posts: 396
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2021 5:30 pm
Location: AK

Re: 1951 Standard pistol

Post by arcticruger »

rpm enterprises wrote: Sat Jan 29, 2022 9:17 am Here is a consecutive pair. One has the chrome trigger and the other has a blued trigger.
Curious, is the safety marked with a F and S on the type 9 in your pic ?
rpm enterprises
Posts: 90
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2021 8:38 am

Re: 1951 Standard pistol

Post by rpm enterprises »

arcticruger wrote: Sun Jan 30, 2022 2:21 pm
rpm enterprises wrote: Sat Jan 29, 2022 9:17 am Here is a consecutive pair. One has the chrome trigger and the other has a blued trigger.
Curious, is the safety marked with a F and S on the type 9 in your pic ?
I looked in one safe and found another blue trigger auto and it does have the F and S . The consecutive blue trigger gun must be in one of the other safes.
Post Reply