ROCS Display
Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 9:07 am
If ROCS Display shows would give a prize for the Ugliest Ruger ever built I would buy one of the new Ruger No1 450 Bushmaster and surly win top honors. 
Page 1 of 1
Re: ROCS Display
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:05 pm
The new #1 in 450 is in my mind a thing of beauty.
Re: ROCS Display
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 8:41 am
Now I know what the Friend & Foe settings are for, I just added one.
Re: ROCS Display
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 11:33 am
I wanted the #1s in 44 mag. but that did not work out. The 450 bushmaster to me is a much better choice for hunting most anything in North America what's not to like, compact and hits hard.
Re: ROCS Display
Posted: Fri May 26, 2017 6:56 am
I just can't get over a muzzle break on a No.1 rifle. Ugly as Hell !!
Re: ROCS Display
Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2017 8:59 pm
I guess with these the beauty (or functionality) is in the eye of the beholder, but I think they may need a set of bifocals 
. I personally have a thing for the sleek lines of the AH / BH configurations, but obviously not too many others share that opinion, since they don't make them often.
Anyway, does any one know the story on these bushmasters? They are not shown on the Ruger website. Are they a Lipsey's brain child?
. I personally have a thing for the sleek lines of the AH / BH configurations, but obviously not too many others share that opinion, since they don't make them often. Anyway, does any one know the story on these bushmasters? They are not shown on the Ruger website. Are they a Lipsey's brain child?