ROCS Display

No. 1 and No. 3
Post Reply
X1Ruger
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2014 12:45 pm

ROCS Display

Post by X1Ruger »

If ROCS Display shows would give a prize for the Ugliest Ruger ever built I would buy one of the new Ruger No1 450 Bushmaster and surly win top honors. :D
Big Old Boy
Posts: 187
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2014 6:40 pm
Location: Columbia Tn.

Re: ROCS Display

Post by Big Old Boy »

The new #1 in 450 is in my mind a thing of beauty.
X1Ruger
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2014 12:45 pm

Re: ROCS Display

Post by X1Ruger »

Now I know what the Friend & Foe settings are for, I just added one.
Big Old Boy
Posts: 187
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2014 6:40 pm
Location: Columbia Tn.

Re: ROCS Display

Post by Big Old Boy »

I wanted the #1s in 44 mag. but that did not work out. The 450 bushmaster to me is a much better choice for hunting most anything in North America what's not to like, compact and hits hard.
Skooter63
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri May 26, 2017 6:49 am

Re: ROCS Display

Post by Skooter63 »

I just can't get over a muzzle break on a No.1 rifle. Ugly as Hell !!
zebra55
Posts: 348
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2016 6:55 pm
Location: Michigan

Re: ROCS Display

Post by zebra55 »

I guess with these the beauty (or functionality) is in the eye of the beholder, but I think they may need a set of bifocals :geek: . I personally have a thing for the sleek lines of the AH / BH configurations, but obviously not too many others share that opinion, since they don't make them often.

Anyway, does any one know the story on these bushmasters? They are not shown on the Ruger website. Are they a Lipsey's brain child?
Post Reply