44 FT boxes

Includes all Pre-1973 Old model Single-Sixes, Blackhawks,
Super Blackhawks, Bearcats, Super Bearcats, Hawkeye
and Black Powder Old Army.
Post Reply
Jwhardin
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2025 4:13 pm

44 FT boxes

Post by Jwhardin »

While packing this group of 4 boxes for upcoming move, noticed the bottom one was different.

Look at the bottom box "C" in BLACKHAWK... were the 2 different C's an early or late production thing or maybe different suppliers?

Have others with C like the bottom one, but most others are like the top 3.

20250927_182658.jpg
flattop44
Posts: 2589
Joined: Tue May 06, 2014 2:31 pm
Location: Alabama

Re: 44 FT boxes

Post by flattop44 »

That's interesting, I have never noticed it. You have sharp eyes my friend.
FT44
JAYDAWG
Posts: 1025
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2017 1:14 pm
Location: Olympic Peninsula

Re: 44 FT boxes

Post by JAYDAWG »

Wow,
Very cool.
Like Bill said, good eye!
I do not "own" these guns, I am but the next caretaker
twriggen
Posts: 169
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2021 4:42 pm
Location: Idaho Falls, ID

Re: 44 FT boxes

Post by twriggen »

I went and checked all of mine and I do not have the odd "C" on any of my boxes. Neat
Troy

Possessions have a way of possessing their possessors. - Daniel L. Dustin
User avatar
LDB
Posts: 68
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2025 2:58 pm
Location: Houston(ish)

Re: 44 FT boxes

Post by LDB »

Not only the different font of the C but the other writing is more orange tinted on that one versus more yellow on the others, at least to my eyes.
NRA Life Member, TSRA Life Member
A firearm without a round chambered is an expensive fancy paperweight.
chet15
Posts: 880
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2014 11:28 am

Re: 44 FT boxes

Post by chet15 »

I suppose that can happen with a different printer, but to my knowledge Ruger only had one printer for these types of boxes.
In that case, perhaps that printer just did different/renewed artwork or obtained updated equipment.
The 2nd box pictured is for a .41 mag.
Also, there are 2 known .44 FT boxes with “Catalog No. BKH-46”.
Post Reply