Collector or Accumulator? What made you go down the rabbit hole?
Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2026 9:31 pm
I have a modest accumulation of firearms. Prior to 6 years ago, I had 5. During Covid, two things happened. First I won an RMEF raffle that contained three guns, a Mossberg 30-06 plastic nightmare that went down the road within weeks of shooting it, a SCCY 9mm that I still own, but only because the price I would get for it is not enough to put the energy into selling it, and a Ruger American Rimfire in .17HMR (second Ruger and first intro into .17HMR). Then a relative passed and I inherited (bought from the estate) a 1964 OM SBH that I have posted about, and a 2002 10/22 that was still in the box (son got that for Christmas that year), and a 181 series Mini, there were a few more, but those are the only ones important to this thread.
I still do not know why that OM SBH ticked my boxes, but it did. It ticked them hard enough I decided I needed one in every caliber, and a couple different variations along the way (flat tops, a flat gate): But... I stopped there (other than the occasional search for a 10" and the constant search for a sequential or duplicate serial). Then I discovered the NM Hunters (plow handle, I still don't like Bisleys): I don't have the .17 convertible, just the .17hmr. Again, small set, but a good representation.
Then I learned about the No. 1's.... I had to have one in my hunting caliber, 30-06. Thanks to a member on rf.com, I was able to pick up a beauty, who thanks to USPS ineptitude, and a mistake in not sending an MO with tracking, I "paid" for twice. Both MO's arrived on the same day and since he had a pristine .357 Flattop with gorgeous wood that he was selling for the same price... well that's how I picked up my first flattop. Thanks to a member on rf.net, I learned they also made the No. 1 in stainless and laminate.... I don't know why that salt and pepper laminate calls to me, but it does.. a few months later: Along the way I had picked up a few other Rugers, mostly on whims, some as part of a dedicated search. Some of those "one-offs" turned into another rabbit hole... hence the 1911's.
I do still have some Ruger "one-offs"; a US marked Ruger Mk 1 (I have a Mark IV target, but those are the only two in that product line), a 96/22Mag that I just lucked into, an SR556 (which was my first AR after I got out of the army, now I own 7 in 7 different calibers), I'm up to 7 10/22 ranging in DOB from '69-'24 all mostly unique, and partially due to the Hunters, I own as many NM as I do OM.
Now I find that my "stash" consists of 69% Ruger, said percentage is likely to increase in the coming days.
So, for the TL/DR crowd, and everyone who managed to get through my lengthy post, 1) Why Ruger, and why that particular line? 2) Which came first, the maker or the gun? 3) How "laser-focused" are you? To use what I know about, similar to the OM vs NM debate, would a similar gun, that is a different model, satisfy that "itch"
I still do not know why that OM SBH ticked my boxes, but it did. It ticked them hard enough I decided I needed one in every caliber, and a couple different variations along the way (flat tops, a flat gate): But... I stopped there (other than the occasional search for a 10" and the constant search for a sequential or duplicate serial). Then I discovered the NM Hunters (plow handle, I still don't like Bisleys): I don't have the .17 convertible, just the .17hmr. Again, small set, but a good representation.
Then I learned about the No. 1's.... I had to have one in my hunting caliber, 30-06. Thanks to a member on rf.com, I was able to pick up a beauty, who thanks to USPS ineptitude, and a mistake in not sending an MO with tracking, I "paid" for twice. Both MO's arrived on the same day and since he had a pristine .357 Flattop with gorgeous wood that he was selling for the same price... well that's how I picked up my first flattop. Thanks to a member on rf.net, I learned they also made the No. 1 in stainless and laminate.... I don't know why that salt and pepper laminate calls to me, but it does.. a few months later: Along the way I had picked up a few other Rugers, mostly on whims, some as part of a dedicated search. Some of those "one-offs" turned into another rabbit hole... hence the 1911's.
I do still have some Ruger "one-offs"; a US marked Ruger Mk 1 (I have a Mark IV target, but those are the only two in that product line), a 96/22Mag that I just lucked into, an SR556 (which was my first AR after I got out of the army, now I own 7 in 7 different calibers), I'm up to 7 10/22 ranging in DOB from '69-'24 all mostly unique, and partially due to the Hunters, I own as many NM as I do OM.
Now I find that my "stash" consists of 69% Ruger, said percentage is likely to increase in the coming days.
So, for the TL/DR crowd, and everyone who managed to get through my lengthy post, 1) Why Ruger, and why that particular line? 2) Which came first, the maker or the gun? 3) How "laser-focused" are you? To use what I know about, similar to the OM vs NM debate, would a similar gun, that is a different model, satisfy that "itch"