What's up with Rugerforum.com?

[chet15]

I haven't had any issues getting on there.
Chet15

[Coogs]

It was down for almost two days.........been back up now..........who knows? Maybe it was regional?

[flattop44]

Naw, it spread way down South too!!
FT44

[chet15]

Has anybody else noticed over the last 6 months to a year that there have been quite a few less inquiries/responses on Rugerforum.com?
It may just be a sign of the times...but hoping its not because of login issues getting on to the site, etc.
ROCS and Rugerforum.com and Rugerforum.net are sites that need to keep going to help boost our cause...just hoping there aren't a group of people out there who are frustrated about not being able to go on RF.com., so choose to say nothing.
Chet15

[Fox Mike]

I thought it was just me that noticed that. The 'regulars' are there but there doesn't seem to be too much new issues arising. I know that everyone's questions have not all been answered. I travel to this site and the other two Ruger sites daily but tend to gravitate to the .com forum. I personally find this and the .com site much easier to navigate than the .net, PLUS no ads.

[Hawkeye28]

Have been with RugerForum.com for a long time. I do not share the crude commentary from the preceding author (BAKEBFR480)and find it crude, rude, and distasteful. Suggest the writer communicate with the Rugerforum.com staff and see if his feelings have merit.

[gunman42782]

Heck, I bought a computer just so I could get on Rugerfourm.com, at Hawkeye 28s suggestion, many years ago!

[zebra55]

Have been with RugerForum.com for a long time. I do not share the crude commentary from the preceding author (BAKEBFR480)and find it crude, rude, and distasteful. Suggest the writer communicate with the Rugerforum.com staff and see if his feelings have merit.

He has a trend of rude posts on this forum....